Bob Barnard Track Engineering

Strange doings at the Rolex qualifying at Daytona yesterday. The Ferrari 430 entered by Aten, my mate Tony Dowe, was withdrawn by the "owner" at the last minute. Which begs the question, what else are you going to do with it? Put it in a museum? Why spend all last year building this, and rebuilding it after the fire at the "Roar" test weekend, and then decide not to race it? No one seems to know who the owner is, except presumably Tony. To add to the mystery the car seemed to do two laps in the last session, albeit very slowly, according to the timing and scoring. Was this on the truck on the way out? What are we missing here?

Jorg Bergmeister in the Flying Lizards Porsche Riley captured the Daytona Prototype pole position in a triumphant return to Grand Am for the successful ALMS GT2 team, with Dominik Farnbacher taking the GT pole with one of the TRG Porsches. Race starts Saturday at 3:30 pm EST live on Speed, for most of it anyway.

In other things that make you wonder, Oz GP Boss, Ron Walker, has warned of Australia losing the race because there are lots of other countries wanting a race. Really? Ron mentions Russia and India as two, who as far as I know already have one, keep up Ron, and Warsaw. Warsaw? We've had a lot of countries suggested, but perhaps Ron has an inside line to Bernie. Then there are Qatar, Dubhai and Kuwait, which are now the center of the F1 universe, we could run the whole series there, the World Cup are going to Qatar after all, and that old chestnut, Staten Island. ISC tried that one Ron, and see how long that lasted. Sometimes you have to wonder which world Ron is living in. A friend who worked for him on the Melbourne GP told me some weird stories.

Bernie of course has told the Mayor of Melbourne that there is no problem handing the race back, just call his office and work out the details. The penalty more like. This is all good fun isn't it? First the ASN, CAMS, say they are going to take it off the calendar because they are not getting enough of the payout from the race, sorry I mean the "profit," and the Premier of South Australia has to chime in with how Melbourne have screwed it up. Eh? Weren't they the ones who screwed it up enough that Bernie went to Melbourne in the first place? Most people think Australia is one country when it is actually a collection of States each with a direct line to The Queen, and who loosely agreed to work together at the start of the last century. They could not even agree then about where the capital should be so they had to build a new one, Canberra, in the middle of nowhere, and get an American to design it. When I worked for the South Australian Commissioner of Highways we were arguing about what color the lines should be down the center of the road! So you can see how they will all squabble over almost anything.

The new F150 Ferrari was unveiled today, the first of this year's cars, and to an untrained eye it does not look unlike last year's. But that is what the Designer said himself, but then said it wasn't. I guess the designers are so prescribed now it is hard to make the car look much different. Of course there is the disclaimer that the car that hits the track in Bahrain will look very different. So why "launch" it? I thought the front wing was supposed to be narrower and simpler this year, does not look it. Apparently the rear suspension is very trick, but it is hard to see from the photos.

Luca di Montezemolo is still sounding off about how F1 needs to stay the technology leader and decries that aerodynamics are over emphasized compared to the mechanics of the car. Keep pushing Luca, someone has to, until you go off to run Italy that is. It is suggested that naming the car the F150 in honor of the years since Italy was created from a number of States, sound familiar, is a political ploy to promote Luca's strong feelings for his Country.

So NASCAR were more than thinking about changing the point system, they have done it, and what a major change it is, not! Last still gets a point, and it is a straight 43 for a win down to 1 for 43rd. But they want to make winning more valuable, so you get three bonus points for winning. Doesn't that mean you get 46 points for winning? And this is simpler? Then there is a point for leading a lap, which I always thought was there anyway, and one more for leading the most laps. Now the news report says that "it is also expected to to keep gaps tighter than in the past." So where's the reward for winning? Then there is the wonderful "Chase" where the last two spots will be decided on who has won the most races out of the next ten drivers, and this is simpler? As I said the other day, deckchairs on the Titanic. Oh yes, and to bring them into the modern world they are going to use vented gas cans to do away with the vent guy. How about a proper fuel rig like any other professional motor sport, and while you are at it centre lock wheels and pneumatic jacks? The only good idea I read was to move away from the CoT and for "the season ahead the cars will have new front ends." Is that this year or next year?  Then "within two years the cars are expected to more closely models being sold." What a concept, isn't that where we came in?

Poor old Flavio, first his yacht, now his bank account with 1.5 million Euros. Italian police have seized the money for tax evasion. This is the guy who is supposedly banned from F1 but still manages two drivers and wants back in. He presumably took the news well at HIS resort in Kenya. One has to ask, how did he amass so much money from being a team manager and driver agent? It's one thing being rich, but he seems like Bernie to have a bottomless pit of the stuff.

So Red Bull say they have a clause in Vettel's contract that if he wins races and finishes within the top three this year they have a contract for 2012. Isn't that the same as many driver contracts that say if I do not win then I can leave? I still have a problem with Vettel going to Ferrari while Alonso is there. If he thinks Mark Webber was a difficult team mate he should ask Lewis about Alonso. I would have thought as a driver I would be happy with the best car of whatever make, so what is it with Ferrari? I mean, I get the history and mystique, but not quite sure why it is assumed every driver wants to go there. Not every Ferrari driver has good memories of the place.

Is there any significance that Ducati chose to debut this years superbike with Rossi on board the same day as the official WSBK test started? There are 21 riders entered for the WSBK, but it looks like the usual suspects. What is the average age does anyone know? Cycle World had this piece on Facebook, "World Superbike CEO Paolo Flammini said on age limits, "The age limits present in 600 and 1000 Superstock classes have been made more generous for two main reasons: The first is that 40 year olds can now become World Champions, so why stop 24 year olds from racing?" Is anyone else confused, and if not can you explain? The Ducati test? It seems Mr. Rossi's shoulder is hurting more than anyone thought. Let's see when the season starts.

Now this has nothing to do with motor racing, not directly anyway,but an item on AOL news struck my fancy. Fitness pioneer Jack LaLanne passed away at the ripe old age of 96. Great you think. Well from what I've seen here in the US Jack failed miserably. And on a personal note, my Father never worked out a day in his life apart from the odd game of tennis, smoked until he was 55, drank and put more salt on his food than anyone I have seen, and died at 97. So, all you fitness fanatics, relax. It's all in the genes it seems.

So, talking of active old men, the Bernie bribery scandal will not go away, not that I expected it to. I think someone is out to nail Bernie in this. Stern, the German news magazine that just loves this stuff, says it has a letter that shows Bernie paid the bribe. I don't think it does. It is supposedly a letter from a lawyer on behalf of Gribkowsky asking for the balance of the money, $2.3m. That is a bit different to a check stub from Bernie's bank, and who are the sources that said Bernie was outraged at receiving the letter? All the people close enough to Bernie to know that have been with him forever because they are loyal and keep their mouth shut. And maybe Bernie was outraged because he never paid the bribe in the first place? Stern are going to keep digging and it seems in this day and age almost anything is discoverable. The question remains, if they can prove he did it, what then? Do the German authorities act? Is the original deal reversible? Would Bernie go to jail? This has the potential of shaking the current F1 foundations. Or is it another "Hitler's Diary?" Wasn't Stern involved in that little fraud?

Just after the Korean GP boss is let go the Indian GP boss, Mark Hughes, has left "for personal reasons." Always a nice euphemism that. Meanwhile the Australian GP boss, Ron Walker has hit back at the Mayor of Melbourne saying that the GP is a "huge profit" for the city and the State. Unfortunately for Ron the State Premier is suggesting he would not mind if they did not have to pay quite so much for all this "profit."

The "will the real Lotus please stand up" court case started today, so much for settling it out of court. It is only a preliminary hearing so this farce seems likely to drag on all year.

All of Audi's drivers from last years 1-2-3 finish at Le Mans have re-signed for 2011, and why wouldn't they after that performance?

Only three days to the start of practice for the Rolex, and a week till F1 testing kicks off. It's nearly over.

So the Mayor of Melbourne thinks the "Times Up" for the F1GP and said "I know of no city that has voluntarily walked away from a grand prix, but could Melbourne be the first?" Well I guess there has to be a first. I'm sure quite a few GP promoters now feel that they have given Bernie and CVC enough. Look at Turkey, Spa, France has actually given up, and at the recent Forum in Cologne the Malaysians said they had achieved what they set out to do, now they need to make some money. We had the recent reports on Valencia perhaps not wanting to go on, and Hockenheim has stopped, so perhaps Melbourne is not the first? Even Singapore, Bernie's jewel, is saying they are going to examine the benefits closely before renewing. Are we going to see some common sense appear? I doubt it, there are always more suckers lining up to donate to the CVC fund.

Melbourne provides an interesting insight into how the costs have escalated. When they started in 1996 the race was underwritten to the tune of $1.7m, and last year cost $50m, with a forecast of $70m in years to come. This cannot all be due to sponsorship dropping. There is a pattern here, Adelaide lost the race to Melbourne when the people and politicians tired of the cost and inconvenience.

Great article on Superbike Planet today about Lorenzo's visit to the Kenny Roberts school of hard knocks at his ranch in Hickman. I included the training school in my book, and my frequent visits to the local urgent care with would-be racers, and how Kenny will stop the race as soon as he is leading. Lorenzo is reportedly shocked a guy 30 years older can beat him. Silly boy, he needs to realize Kenny can still beat anyone over a short race, say a lap! Here is the link.

http://superbikeplanet.com/2011/Jan/110117krlorenzo.htm

Sir Frank Williams, a gentleman of a similar age and will to win, is considering floating the Williams team. This could relate to Joe Saward's story yesterday about Qatar Holdings being interested in a connection with Williams. More power to Sir Frank, who is emphasising that this does not mean he is stepping back from his role in the team.

Now we hear today that Boullier is considering Grosjean as the "third driver" for the Lotus Renault team. Surely he means fourth? Or is it a tie for third with Fauzy? Strange doings. And Peter Collins is now saying his driver Luizzi  may not drive in F1 this year, so can we finally sort out who is driving Force India before the test starts in 12 days time? Sutil and Di Resta with Hulkenburg as the third presumably.

Terrible to hear about Dean Stoneman's illness, and I'm sure we all wish him a recovery to rival Lance Armstrong's.

Sounds like an interesting evening at the Sydney Speedway a week ago with Tony Stewart getting into an altercation with one of the track owners and the police getting involved. My old mate Garry Rush is also an owner of that speedway, and I could sell tickets if he and Tony got into it. Another dynamite old racer who can still do it when required, and I'm sure he will not mind the "old." They used to say "there are old racers and bold racers, but there are no old, bold, racers." Not sure that applies anymore. Perhaps he and Tony could have sorted it all out with a match race?

Martin Whitmarsh has stated that the FIA and FOTA will not let the movable wing "fail." They will "tweak" the rules, which as I have been saying, remain unclear, but here is perhaps the best explanation from his interview with Autosport.

"Drivers will have the system primed in the race when FIA-monitored GPS technology tells them they are less than one-second behind the car in front at a certain point of the circuit. This only becomes valid two laps after the start of a safety car restart.

However, to ensure that the wing boost advantage is not over-egged, the FIA will only allow use of the wing's speed boost at a single zone on the track. This will be carefully monitored and controlled to ensure that overtaking still remains a challenge - and this area may not even be on the main start-finish straight."

So, only in one spot, and the boys will know which zone that is and hopefully so will we. Drivers can use the KERS system either to defend or to help with the wing's reduced drag. So is this going to be better or not? Are they all going to drive around behind another car waiting for that spot, and not try anywhere else? Is that better than no overtaking? I'm sorry, this all seems contrived, like Bernie's "short cut" idea. Let them move the wing whenever they want. What happens though when to overtake at the end of the straight the driver leaves the wing in low downforce too long? His braking is compromised so he will lose out at the corner, or worse go off. Is the FIA going to have another "trigger" to turn it off at a safe distance from the corner?