Bob Barnard Track Engineering

Who should make the rules in F1? Bernie thinks the FIA is a joke and "we" and the teams should make the rules and the FIA just act as policemen to enforce them. Well, the last time I looked the motorists do not make the rules, Parliament does, and their employees, the Police, enforce them, just like the FIA. But is this the right way to run this sport? NASCAR does not let the teams make the rules, but perhaps Bernie is looking at the NFL where the teams own the league, make the rules, employ the refs, and basically run things the way they want. Except we now have a lockout because they do not run the players. I imagine "we" is Bernie, a sort of League Commissioner. I can only imagine what we would be watching if Bernie made the rules.

Then there is dear Max who cannot help himself. Talking about the Bahrain GP situation he said;

"Sport must be separated from politics," Mosley insisted. "If that was not so, there would only be major sporting events in half the current amount of countries.

"Moral and political evaluations do not belong in sport," he added.

Then what does Max? Money? What about the athletes oath before an Olympic Games? I suppose what Renault did in Singapore is fair game then if "Moral ...evaluations" do not belong in sport. And where would Bernie and CVC be if the politicians did not use government money to buy and stage the events to promote their own image and agenda?

F1 practice kicks off shortly under expected wet conditions. That would stop us learning much about the tire situation. Are HRT actually going to have a complete car(s), or is Australian customs going to hold up some vital part? Can it make the 107% cut off? Bernie is not there of course, but nor is he in New York it seems. Mr. Walker has been feeding misinformation, but why and on who's behalf?  His own I suspect, I think he is desperate to keep the GP in Melbourne and keep his job. It is a situation that Adelaide found itself in where the GP believes in its own importance and forgets why it is there and the people of the State that they serve.

Those journalists who take the Staten Island F1 track seriously should really do their homework and check out what happened when ISC tried to build a speedway. Now I suspect ISC actually has a bit more clout than Bernie in the US, but their project got no further than the first Planning Meeting, which the police closed down after about half an hour. One union guy had a Planning Board member in a head lock as I recall. ISC were looking at all sorts of ways to get spectators to the event as the four bridges are already at capacity, so buses and ferries. Getting in and out of here would make the old Silverstone look like a picnic. The opposition was so strong ISC dropped the project despite having spent a bundle on it.

We are two days away from the start of the F1 season and all the news is about Vettel shearing sheep? Not much else going on. Webber is the latest driver to come out against the movable wing, asking why he has to use it in qualifying? The answer is he does not, he just won't be as fast as those that do.

On a personal note, why is it that people who approach you about being involved in a project cannot have the courtesy to acknowledge your response, or give you a reply? No, they just disappear. Do they expect me to work for free or for "equity." I cannot believe that anyone worth hiring is going to charge them less or be willing to travel half way around the world at your own time and expense. If they do then they are talking to the wrong guy. I have not done this for over 25 years to be going around cap in hand. It also amazes me when I am asked to submit a list of qualifications or a bid. If you have found me then I would presume you know my qualifications, they are a matter of public record, and I know the person who will be assessing my qualifications is unlikely to be qualified to do so. And would you ask one of the world class architects, such as Pei, to bid on a project? No, you select him on merit and then argue about the fee. So much for today's pet peeve.

It seems like the day for stating the obvious. In Melbourne it is raining and the forecast is for changeable weather. Anyone who has been there knows that this is the Melbourne weather forecast every day, "If you don't like the weather, wait half an hour." HRT is in financial trouble. Stunned and amazed I am, and apparently the dampers were not the only things missing on the car and would have come by truck from Germany anyway so no customs required. Wages also seem to be something that is missing for the team. Now I do not wish anybody ill for trying, just for lying.

Something that is also changeable in Melbourne is Bernie's man Ron Walker. Despite Bernie saying a few weeks ago he was coming to Melbourne to put some spark into it as he is such a celebrity, he now is reportedly going to New York to meet Mayor Bloomberg. Nice negotiating ploy that Bernie. So Ron is quoted on one web site as saying the sky is falling, look what you've done Mayor of Melbourne, and on another he has an option on a five year extension and the race is safe. So much so he wants the Government to dole out another bundle of money to build a permanent track at his old mate Lindsay Fox's Avalon airport. If it's good to spend on a Tennis Center then why not.

It does not sound like Lewis Hamilton wants to change anytime soon, "Red Bull is just a drinks company." Not a real race team like McLaren and Ferrari.

As we approach the first race the "noise" level from the drivers about too many buttons and too much to do in the cockpit is increasing. Martin Whitmarsh is again saying they are still testing the movable rear wing idea and it is subject to "tweaks," and the Technical Working Group is already reviewing the steering wheel overload to try and reduce the work inside the cockpit for the drivers as soon as next year. Bernie is still twittering on about sprinklers and is surprised at the support he has from people like Tavo, and other tame promoters. I'm not.

No not the kind you peddle, the business, economic, civilization rise and fall kind. I know this sounds all esoteric but bear with me. I think I have commented before on how "developing" countries are discovering motorsport and us "developed," or overdeveloped some would say, countries are struggling to keep the viewers attention. I receive lots of approaches from would be track owners, both here in the States and overseas, but not the south of France unfortunately. Here in the US, apart from Tavo over there in Austin, would-be owners have limited budgets and are afraid of committing to proceed. Not so in those developing countries where money seems easy to spend, like Croatia's F1 track. They are going to spend $450m in a country of  1.5 m people with an average wage of $17,500. I know it is close to other borders, but does this really make sense? Obviously it does to them.

I am supposed to be overseas now, but the bureaucrats cannot get a vise issued in less than two weeks, and this weekend I have had approaches from a Middle East and Far Eastern country about developments that include not only tracks but major tourist infrastructure. So what is going on? Well, the Bob Barnard theory is we are seeing a cycle where interest grows, just as economies and civilizations, and then peaks and falls down the back slope. I see the US particularly on the back slope in respect of motorsport. Just as Rome ended up consumed by "bread and circuses" so the young generation are consumed by virtual sports, fantasy leagues etc. In developing countries the opposite is happening, new found disposable income is letting them discover how much fun motor racing is. I went to Taiwan a long time ago to advise on a track and was told the children do not want to work all the time like their ancestors, they want time for fun and were basically racing on the streets.

So, am I in the wrong country? Not really, I like it here and still believe there is life in the sport, it is just changing to participation by rich guys in their Ferraris and Porsches on Country Club tracks. When you look at most racing in this country that is what is going on anyway.

Talking of developing countries, Casey Stoner won the Qatar MotoGP from Lorenzo on the Yamaha and a whole lot of Hondas. When I saw a photo of Casey out in front my first reaction was it was him and daylight, but of course it was moonlight. So we know the Hondas are the real deal and the Yamaha cannot be ruled out so we should have a good year. The Ducati was where we expected, and I know his shoulder is still a problem, but Jeremy and Vale need to get something sorted on that bike.

The debate over the Sebring live streaming coverage continues, check out the piece on Last Turn Club that echoed my thoughts that if it is not on live TV it cannot be important. It seems that the ABC "highlight" package either was not shown in some places or lived down to expectations. Can someone explain why some ISP's do not provide access to espn3.com? It will be interesting to see how many cars actually start at Long Beach now we are back to the ALMS, not many I suspect. I loved Duncan Dayton's comment that Sebring was a test for them and it was good of the other 55 cars to turn up! It is pretty amazing how that car ran faultlessly. Think back to last year with a "sorted" car. From my memory they had a bunch of problems, mainly electrical. As Pagenaud said, he'd better watch out for the Highcroft car at Le Mans where he will be back in the Peugeot.

The Lotus naming row is in court with things getting murkier by the moment with David Hunt now saying his deal with Tony Fernandes was not completed. Good luck to the Judge sorting this lot out. I'd tell them both not to use the name and to get on with it.

McLaren are going into this weekend with a revamped exhaust and floor in an attempt to find another second. Not a good way to start a season, but if anyone can do it they should be able to.

Well I joined Chairman Atherton's brave new world yesterday and watched the 12 hour on espn3.com. I have to admit to being a sceptic and was actually pleasantly surprised. After connecting my lap top to the TV via an HDMI cable which I already had, and some teething problems, it ran faultlessly all day. Could not use the lap top for anything else, but hey, I was watching the race. Not sure why some folks cannot get espn3.com? This is the first time I've been on it and it won't be the last. When I first connected my soccer team was being shown live.

The Radio Le Mans commentary added to the enjoyment, I turn the sound off on Speed and listen to these guys anyway so I was pleasantly surprised by it. The only jarring note were the required female and American in pit lane for the ABC highlights show presumably. When will they learn to keep their mouth shut unless there is something worth saying, and no we do not need to be told that the fuel goes in first at every stop. I particularly liked being told that the windscreens had to be cleaned because of the "daylight sunshine." That nightime sunshine can be deadly to. Mind you John Hindhaugh, the main man at Radio Le Mans has his Murray Walker moments. After a couple of hours of great racing John admitted he "could watch this all day." Well John it's a 12 hour race so your in luck. But I knew what he meant and love his passion and knowledge as we loved Murray's. Motor Sport had a great interview with Murray this month in which Murray said that commentators could not fake excitement or enthusiasm. Take note Lee Diffey, and no one could accuse Bob Varsha of faking either, Mr. Bland. I was amused by the number of comments on how hot it was. I guess if you come from the north of England it is, in which case do not come back in a couple of months time John.

To me it was more enjoyable watching this broadcast than Speed. Much less interruption for commercials, although the two we had got old very quickly. There were the inevitable "infomercials", but again these seemed less intrusive, perhaps because we were seeing so much of the race. Why oh Why does Atherton feel he has to talk to the commentators at every race, and who cares? Is it an insecurity complex? As I said before, Bernie never feels the need, nor Brian France. There were too many extended in-car camera shots, as good as they were, and static camera shots like the camera crew were on break, but this is nit-picking.

The race was a cracker, with three cars capable of winning down to the wire. Great to see Hughes de Chaunac's Oreca Team win it, and the tears in Hughes eyes are a testament to his passion for the sport despite the many years and great success he has had. Not to mention the incredible job done by Highcroft to finish second and nearly steal the race, in a petrol Honda that only turned a wheel a week ago. Well done Duncan, Brabs and the rest of the team, and on to Le Mans. Peugeot finished third in their new car, but both Peugeot and Audi ran into problems and each other, but let's not take anything away from Oreca and Highcroft, they were on the pace and not just lucky. Hard to see what the ALMS is going to do for LMP1 cars though, and the LMP2 were disappointing to say the least.

Not so the GT's who put on their usual performance with 5 or 6 cars running together most of the race. Well done Bobby Rahal and BMW, but we can expect the new Ferrari's to come back strong. Corvette avoided the debacles of last year to finish strong, so we are in for a stellar year, again. It is hard to accept, as the pit lane reporters seemed to do, that overseas professional teams did not know the rule book because it was their first time here. I'm sure Tony Dowe would not be making these mistakes wherever he went.

Corvette showed their in-car video display from the rear facing cameras which lead me to the question, why not build them into the wing mirrors?

The track played its part in the proceedings as is normal for Sebring. At what point do the bumps, that is a mild term to describe them, stop being "character" and become dangerous? We saw cars being destroyed thanks to Turn Seventeen particularly, and we were fortunate we did not see serious injury to Johannes van Overbook  when his Jaguar was tipped into the fence through no fault of his own. It is time Don dipped into his wallet and spent some money to maintain this place.

So, is the "game changer" a success? Well for me as an enthusiast and a professional involved in the sport it was actually an improvement, but how many average fans are going to go to the trouble to do this? OK, the next generation are being brought up on live streaming on handhelds, but are they interested in motorsport anyway? The evidence says not. Is a two hour highlights show on ABC today going to bring new viewers? Perhaps, the average sports fan is brought up on a diet of two or three hour games, so watching twelve hours is unlikely. The viewing figures will tell the story, but again, will the average fan think our sport unimportant if not worthy of live TV?

Elsewhere the MotoGP season is underway in Qatar in what should be a good race, at least for third as Julian Ryder said. C'mon Aussie! Bernie is up to his games again saying this could be the last F1 GP in Australia this week, he has to drop two races anyway to make way for Austin and Russia, so it may as well be Oz. Nice negotiating position. Vettel is making noises that if the drivers are not happy with the rules this year they may withdraw their labor. He needs to talk to the drivers who tried that on in South Africa a couple of decades ago. Bernie's position on drivers is like buses, there will be another one along soon.