Bob Barnard Track Engineering

No, I am not finally sick of cars, no one ever gets over that, but the last time I can recall ever being car sick was about eleven years old, until I got in a simulator that is. It seems Michael Schumacher and I have the same problem, simulators give us motion sickness. Now I have raced cars, flown in small planes across the heat of Australia's deserts, sailed boats and been on a Catamaran out to the Barrier Reef when everyone on board except four of us were sea sick, so this came as a great shock to me. Can anyone explain this phenomenon? After I designed the track here in Arizona the client bought a locally made simulator and they loaded the track layout. It worked great, but I could only do a few laps before feeling very disoriented and queasy. Not much of an inconvenience for me, but it must be a huge problem for Michael, everyone else has the car set up before they even get to the track and he starts from scratch.

There is the start of a nice article by Julian Ryder on Superbike Planet today about how Superbikes started.

http://superbikeplanet.com/2007/Nov/071119l.htm

It interested me as it talks of Steve McLaughlin, "motormouth" who was instrumental in the first World Championship. I happened to be in Geneva for a meeting of the FIM Management Council the day Steve was there to have the agreement with the FIM signed. Sitting in the lobby for most of the day with Steve was an education.

Joe Saward in his F1 blog today asks the question "why are the media publishing comments from Briatore and Symonds?" As two of the key figures in the "crashgate" debacle he believes that they should not be heard of again, let alone be involved in the sport, and cites numerous examples of life time bans from other sports. He asks if he is on his own with this view, so Joe, since you asked, no.

Is it just me or has the USGP announced three times now that they have started? We saw before the New Year machines on site, but that was only a soil sampling exercise and putting up silt fence.  Then we had a "photo op" the other day of Tavo driving some machine on site, started again. And now today we read that USGP is set to receive digging permission. Now I do not doubt they will get it done, but please quit the over hype, it does them no favors.

The judge in the Lotus case quickly disposed of the first hearing refusing Lotus Groups submission to throw the action out even before their lawyers said anything, and rather than let it drag on he has set it down for March 21, suggesting they sort themselves out before then. Nice one judge. Tony Fernandes is quoted as saying the good do always win. Not in my world Tony unfortunately, so good luck.

Sounds as if Force India are set to announce Paul Di Resta as a driver for 2011 tomorrow in Glasgow. Why else would you go to Glasgow? So, what now for Luizzi, and his contract?

Pat Symonds, yes the one I said should not be heard from, but is, suggests that F1 needs to do a lot more research on just how much overtaking it needs. Good point, I don't think F1 fans want a NASCAR type lead change every lap, and Lewis Hamilton did not seem to have too much trouble to pass people at most tracks this year, and how about Kobayashi, so perhaps it is attitude not the car? We certainly do not want to see manipulated races.

Now this has nothing to do with motor racing, not directly anyway,but an item on AOL news struck my fancy. Fitness pioneer Jack LaLanne passed away at the ripe old age of 96. Great you think. Well from what I've seen here in the US Jack failed miserably. And on a personal note, my Father never worked out a day in his life apart from the odd game of tennis, smoked until he was 55, drank and put more salt on his food than anyone I have seen, and died at 97. So, all you fitness fanatics, relax. It's all in the genes it seems.

So, talking of active old men, the Bernie bribery scandal will not go away, not that I expected it to. I think someone is out to nail Bernie in this. Stern, the German news magazine that just loves this stuff, says it has a letter that shows Bernie paid the bribe. I don't think it does. It is supposedly a letter from a lawyer on behalf of Gribkowsky asking for the balance of the money, $2.3m. That is a bit different to a check stub from Bernie's bank, and who are the sources that said Bernie was outraged at receiving the letter? All the people close enough to Bernie to know that have been with him forever because they are loyal and keep their mouth shut. And maybe Bernie was outraged because he never paid the bribe in the first place? Stern are going to keep digging and it seems in this day and age almost anything is discoverable. The question remains, if they can prove he did it, what then? Do the German authorities act? Is the original deal reversible? Would Bernie go to jail? This has the potential of shaking the current F1 foundations. Or is it another "Hitler's Diary?" Wasn't Stern involved in that little fraud?

Just after the Korean GP boss is let go the Indian GP boss, Mark Hughes, has left "for personal reasons." Always a nice euphemism that. Meanwhile the Australian GP boss, Ron Walker has hit back at the Mayor of Melbourne saying that the GP is a "huge profit" for the city and the State. Unfortunately for Ron the State Premier is suggesting he would not mind if they did not have to pay quite so much for all this "profit."

The "will the real Lotus please stand up" court case started today, so much for settling it out of court. It is only a preliminary hearing so this farce seems likely to drag on all year.

All of Audi's drivers from last years 1-2-3 finish at Le Mans have re-signed for 2011, and why wouldn't they after that performance?

Only three days to the start of practice for the Rolex, and a week till F1 testing kicks off. It's nearly over.

So the Mayor of Melbourne thinks the "Times Up" for the F1GP and said "I know of no city that has voluntarily walked away from a grand prix, but could Melbourne be the first?" Well I guess there has to be a first. I'm sure quite a few GP promoters now feel that they have given Bernie and CVC enough. Look at Turkey, Spa, France has actually given up, and at the recent Forum in Cologne the Malaysians said they had achieved what they set out to do, now they need to make some money. We had the recent reports on Valencia perhaps not wanting to go on, and Hockenheim has stopped, so perhaps Melbourne is not the first? Even Singapore, Bernie's jewel, is saying they are going to examine the benefits closely before renewing. Are we going to see some common sense appear? I doubt it, there are always more suckers lining up to donate to the CVC fund.

Melbourne provides an interesting insight into how the costs have escalated. When they started in 1996 the race was underwritten to the tune of $1.7m, and last year cost $50m, with a forecast of $70m in years to come. This cannot all be due to sponsorship dropping. There is a pattern here, Adelaide lost the race to Melbourne when the people and politicians tired of the cost and inconvenience.

So HRT have hired a whiz bang Hollywood creative guy to revamp their corporate imagery. Amazing. We cannot afford to build a new car for 2011, but we have money for some imagery, just so you can make believe you are going somewhere. Having a competitive car I would have thought would be the best corporate image.

NASCAR confirms that they are re-evaluating the point system to make it simpler. They have had this one since 1975 and I would have thought everyone would have understood it by now, everyone in the field gets points. Still they are continuing to think about fuel injection so I guess you should not rush these things. Maybe they are analysing the past five years and trying to come up with a points system that will stop Jimmie Johnson winning this year. All smacks of deckchairs on the Titanic.

Nice to see young American rider Kenny Noyes get a new ride in Moto2 for 2011. I admit to a bias, I knew his Dad Dennis well and he helped me a lot when I was in Spain with Kenny Roberts, so it will be good to see him with another chance. Kenny Noyes had an up and down year in 2010, so with a year's experience let's hope for big things in 2011.

This week sees the real start of the season with the Rolex 24 hour. Murphy The Bear has his punters guide and picks for the podium, so check it out at:

http://murphythebear.com/blog/index.php/2011/01/21/182-murphy%E2%80%99s-4th-annual-rolex-24-punter%E2%80%99s-guide-and-some-other-stuff/

Great article on Superbike Planet today about Lorenzo's visit to the Kenny Roberts school of hard knocks at his ranch in Hickman. I included the training school in my book, and my frequent visits to the local urgent care with would-be racers, and how Kenny will stop the race as soon as he is leading. Lorenzo is reportedly shocked a guy 30 years older can beat him. Silly boy, he needs to realize Kenny can still beat anyone over a short race, say a lap! Here is the link.

http://superbikeplanet.com/2011/Jan/110117krlorenzo.htm

Sir Frank Williams, a gentleman of a similar age and will to win, is considering floating the Williams team. This could relate to Joe Saward's story yesterday about Qatar Holdings being interested in a connection with Williams. More power to Sir Frank, who is emphasising that this does not mean he is stepping back from his role in the team.

Now we hear today that Boullier is considering Grosjean as the "third driver" for the Lotus Renault team. Surely he means fourth? Or is it a tie for third with Fauzy? Strange doings. And Peter Collins is now saying his driver Luizzi  may not drive in F1 this year, so can we finally sort out who is driving Force India before the test starts in 12 days time? Sutil and Di Resta with Hulkenburg as the third presumably.

Terrible to hear about Dean Stoneman's illness, and I'm sure we all wish him a recovery to rival Lance Armstrong's.

Sounds like an interesting evening at the Sydney Speedway a week ago with Tony Stewart getting into an altercation with one of the track owners and the police getting involved. My old mate Garry Rush is also an owner of that speedway, and I could sell tickets if he and Tony got into it. Another dynamite old racer who can still do it when required, and I'm sure he will not mind the "old." They used to say "there are old racers and bold racers, but there are no old, bold, racers." Not sure that applies anymore. Perhaps he and Tony could have sorted it all out with a match race?

Martin Whitmarsh has stated that the FIA and FOTA will not let the movable wing "fail." They will "tweak" the rules, which as I have been saying, remain unclear, but here is perhaps the best explanation from his interview with Autosport.

"Drivers will have the system primed in the race when FIA-monitored GPS technology tells them they are less than one-second behind the car in front at a certain point of the circuit. This only becomes valid two laps after the start of a safety car restart.

However, to ensure that the wing boost advantage is not over-egged, the FIA will only allow use of the wing's speed boost at a single zone on the track. This will be carefully monitored and controlled to ensure that overtaking still remains a challenge - and this area may not even be on the main start-finish straight."

So, only in one spot, and the boys will know which zone that is and hopefully so will we. Drivers can use the KERS system either to defend or to help with the wing's reduced drag. So is this going to be better or not? Are they all going to drive around behind another car waiting for that spot, and not try anywhere else? Is that better than no overtaking? I'm sorry, this all seems contrived, like Bernie's "short cut" idea. Let them move the wing whenever they want. What happens though when to overtake at the end of the straight the driver leaves the wing in low downforce too long? His braking is compromised so he will lose out at the corner, or worse go off. Is the FIA going to have another "trigger" to turn it off at a safe distance from the corner?